Insurgentjg


Right to Life

Posted in Pakistan Thoughts by asim on the March 19th, 2008

“Right to life” is a phrase that describes the belief that a human being has an essential right to live, particularly that a human being has the right not to be killed by another human being. The concept of a right to life is central to debates on the issues of capital punishment, euthanasia, self defense, abortion and war.

By liberty we mean how can he or she feel free of doing whatever he or she likes and practices all their deeds freely and as well freedom of expression.

By security we mean how can a person feel secure in his territory and feel free of any kind of threat. Security of person can also be seen as an expansion of rights based on prohibitions of torture and cruel and unusual punishment.. All these rights play very important and significant role in a person’s life and in a society.

 If we give an overview of these rights in Pakistan we will come to know how these rights are been violated in our society. Present regime in which Pakistan’s military has acted with increasing impunity to enforce its writ over the state and to protect its grip on Pakistan’s economic resources, especially land. For instance, in the Okara district of the military’s traditional stronghold of Punjab, paramilitary forces acting in conjunction with the army killed and tortured farmers who refused to cede their land rights to the army. Other pressing human rights concerns in the country include

  • a rise in sectarian violence;
  • legal discrimination against and mistreatment of women and religious minorities;
  • arbitrary detention of political opponents;
  • harassment and intimidation of the media;
  • Lack of due process in the conduct of the “war on terror” in collaboration with the United States. A major military offensive against alleged Taliban and Al-Qaeda forces in the South Waziristan area bordering Afghanistan resulted in massive displacement of civilians and scores of deaths.

 Gender-Based Violence and Discrimination  
Violence against women and girls, including domestic violence, rape, “honor killings,” acid attacks, and trafficking, are rampant in Pakistan. The existing legal code discriminates against women and girls and creates major obstacles to seeking redress in cases of violence. Survivors of violence encounter unresponsiveness and hostility at each level of the criminal justice system, from police who fail to register or investigate cases of gender-based violence to judges with little training or commitment to women’s equal rights.  
Under Pakistan’s existing Hudood Ordinance, proof of rape generally requires the confession of the accused or the testimony of four adult Muslim men who witnessed the assault and if she is unable toprove her innocence she is to be charged for adultery, the criminal penalty for which is either a long prison sentence and public whipping, or, though rare, death by stoning.
According to Pakistan’s Interior Ministry, there have been more than 4,000 honor killings in the last six years. Nongovernmental groups recorded more than 1,300 honor killings in 2003.
Religious Freedom
 
Sectarian violence increased significantly in Pakistan in 2004. While estimates suggest that at least 4,000 people, largely from the minority Shi’a Muslim sect, have died as a result of sectarian violence since 1980, the last five years have witnessed a steep rise in incidents of sectarian violence. For example, in October 2004, at least seventy people were killed in sectarian attacks perpetrated by both Sunni and Shi’a extremist groups in the cities of Multan and Karachi. In recent years, Sunni extremists, often with connections to militant organizations such as Sipah-e Sahaba Pakistan, have targeted the Shi’a. There has been a sharp increase in the number of targeted killings of Shi’a, particularly Shi’a doctors, in recent years. Discrimination and persecution on grounds of religion continued in 2004 and an increasing number of blasphemy cases were registered. Other religious minorities including Christians and Hindus, also continue to face discrimination. 

Military Impunity  
During President Musharraf’s tenure, Pakistan’s military increased its influence over the political and economic life of all Pakistanis. The starkest example of military impunity came from the brutal repression of a farmers’ movement in Okara district of Punjab province, where tens of thousands of tenant farmers have resisted efforts by the military to usurp their legal rights to some of the most fertile farmland in Pakistan. Pakistani paramilitary forces subjected the farmers to a campaign of murder, arbitrary detention, torture, “forced divorces,” and summary dismissals from employment. On two occasions, the paramilitaries literally besieged villages in the area of dispute, thus preventing people, food, and public services from entering or leaving for weeks on end. In Okara, senior military and political officials have either participated in or allowed violations to occur.  
 
“War on Terror”  
The conduct of the “war on terror” in Pakistan led to serious violations of human rights. Suspects arrested and held on terrorism charges frequently were detained without charge and subject to trials without proper judicial process.  
In September 2003, Pakistani authorities detained thirteen young men and boys from Malaysia and Indonesia, the youngest of whom were under sixteen at the time of arrest, legally attending an Islamic school in Karachi. They were not alleged to have engaged in any illegal activity, but were arrested on the claim that they were being trained to engage in future terrorist activities. No charges have been brought against any of them.  
Since March 2004, the Pakistan Army has engaged in an ongoing operation in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) along the Afghan border, with particularly heavy fighting in the South Waziristan region. The Pakistan government did not apply international humanitarian law to the conflict, arguing it was an anti-terrorist operation. These events in the South Waziristan, reports of extrajudicial executions, house demolitions, arbitrary detentions, and the harassment of journalists abound.  
 According to government sources, at least sixty-three foreign and local combatants were killed in the operation. In addition, as the “spring offensive” got underway, army and paramilitary troops reportedly evicted between 25,000 and 35,000 civilians from the area

in and around the village of Kalusha on March 16, 2004.
 
Arbitrary Arrest and Detention of Political Opponents  
The government continued to use the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) and a host of anti-corruption and sedition laws to jail political opponents or blackmail them into changing their political stance or loyalties or at the very least to cease criticizing the military authorities.  
 In April 2004, the president of an opposition party, Makhdoom Javed Hashmi of the Alliance for the Restoration of Democracy, was sentenced to twenty-three years in prison on sedition charges for reading an anti-Musharraf letter to assembled journalists. Meanwhile, Asif Zardari, husband of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto has begun his ninth consecutive year in prison. Initially the government filed twelve cases against Zardari, most based on charges of corruption and financial impropriety.

More than 5,000 people detained during Pakistan’s state of emergency, including opposition leader Imran Khan, in November 2007.  
 
Freedom of Expression
The right of free expression and dissemination of information were persistently undermined through the arrest of editors and reporters from local and regional newspapers on charges of sedition.  
Rasheed Azam, a journalist and claimed he was abused and tortured, including being beaten while hung upside down and subjected to sleep deprivation. He was released after several months in custody though charges of sedition filed against him are still being processed.

Similarly, Amir Mir, a journalist was reportedly publicly threatened by President Musharraf on November 20, 2003. Two days later, three unidentified persons set Amir Mir’s car ablaze outside his house.  
Two French journalists, Marc Epstein and Jean-Paul Guilloteau, and their Pakistani assistant, Khawar Mehdi Rizvi, were arrested in Karachi on December 16, 2003 who  were preparing a report on alleged links between Pakistani government agents and the Taliban operating in neighboring Afghanistan.   
While the Pakistani government did not formally restrict access to South Waziristan during the “spring offensive,” journalists were repeatedly detained or prevented from reporting through tactics such as the destruction or confiscation of equipment. Journalists were eventually allowed limited access to the affected villages on March 28 upon the conclusion of the first phase of the operation. However, media access to FATA in general and South Waziristan in particular remains limited as military operations continue.  

                            

Conclusion

From the all the above points we can see that how important it is to practice these rights in society like Pakistan. Where people are deprived of there rights have to face a lot of hardships. A meaning-filled life is more than mere existence; it involves purpose, direction, and a sense of belonging. Humanistic family values embrace individual rights to autonomy, dignity, free choice, liberty, fraternity, the pursuit of happiness, and security. Our human family has devised a multitude of different ways to accomplish these goals through law, education, role modeling, as well as through words, acts, and symbols of encouragement and support. Each positive effort must be appreciated and inherent differences tolerated. To establish such values and the ethical standards that protect all human beings for the 21st century we must be prepared to learn from the past, evaluate the present, and project the highest and best that we know into our aspirations for the future. We must examine our values on the basis of international, national, and personal commitments.

What we do now is important. We must, each one of us, pledge ourselves to action in helping to move humankind towards a way of living where the humanistic family ethic overlays the nationalistic, linguistic, religious, and ethnic differences that separate us. For the world of the 21st century, humanistic values must project the vision of a peaceful world in which every man, woman or child, or class of men, women, or children shall be a wanted, welcomed, and esteemed member of the one human family. For the world where each person is given right to live with self respect, dignity and honor.

 References:
www.hrw.org
 

This article is based on class discussions ad readings by Anum Atiq

4 Responses to 'Right to Life'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Right to Life'.

  1. Right to Life said,

    on March 19th, 2008 at 3:36 am

    […] Continue Reading […]

  2. child custody laws said,

    on April 5th, 2008 at 8:13 pm

    child custody laws…

    Interestingly, this was on CNN last week….

  3. Savanna said,

    on April 12th, 2008 at 4:23 am

    Savanna…

    If you ever need a helping hand, you’ll find one at the end of your arm. As you grow older you will discover that you have two hands. One for helping yourself, the other for helping others….

  4. Tamiko said,

    on April 13th, 2008 at 2:21 pm

    Tamiko…

    A friend is someone who sees through you and still enjoys the view….

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.